📋 One trading name, two web addresses
⏰ Live since December 2015
Recommended Sportsbook Offers
Advertisement · Contains affiliate links
Offers subject to operator terms. This page contains affiliate links.
⚽ Where a 10Bet bettor can look instead
Neither of these is a sister site. A sister shares the licence named above, so one company answers for both websites; these two belong to different companies entirely. They are here because both are British licensed bookmakers a 10Bet customer could use instead.
📋 What the licence carries, and what it does not
Gambling Commission account 43173 is one numbered file, opened for one licensed company and holding everything the Commission publishes about it. The company is Blue Star Planet Limited, and the head office recorded against it is the Dragonara Business Centre on Dragonara Road in St Julians, Malta.
Three permissions sit on that file, all sharing one licence number, and all three are marked Active from 17 December 2015 with no closing date beside them. One covers casino. One covers betting on real sporting events. One covers betting on virtual ones. Each of the three ends with the word Remote, which marks the difference between gambling sold through a website and gambling sold across a counter, and carries no other meaning here.
The file also lists trading names, which are simply the names a licensed company is cleared to trade under. It lists one, and the one is 10bet.
✅ What actually makes two sites sisters
- The same licensed company stands behind both of them
- Not the same look, not the same games supplier, not the same advertising
- One company, filed under one number, answerable for whatever happens on either
One company and one name sit on this file, so there is no second brand for 10Bet to be a sister to.
Those three permissions are a list of what the company may sell, not what it does sell. One covers casino games, one covers betting on real sporting events, and one covers betting on virtual ones. All three have run without a break since December 2015, and none of them carries a closing date. A permission that has been given up shows the day it ended, and there is no such date anywhere on this file.
🔍 Two web addresses, one bookmaker
The file lists two web addresses and marks both of them Active: www.10bet.co.uk and www.10bet.ie. An address count and a brand count are not the same measurement, and a fair number of sister site lists elsewhere are built by treating them as though they were. Both of these sit against exactly one trading name, so the second address is a second address and not a second business.
The summary counters at the head of the file agree with the tables underneath: two domain names counted, two listed. On bigger files those two figures drift apart, which is worth a glance whenever a total is quoted at you.
The Irish address matters for a different reason. A British licence covers a bet struck in Britain, and a second address on the same file is still the same company holding the same money under the same rules. It adds a way in, not a business, and it moves nothing about who answers when something goes wrong.
⚠️ What has been recorded against it
The regulatory actions part of the file renders no table at all. In its place sits a single sentence, saying that against this business no regulatory action has been recorded. That was the position on 15 August 2026, and it passes no judgement on the company either way.
📋 How to read that one line
- It covers what has been published against this one file and nothing else
- It reaches no further back than December 2015
- It says nothing about what a related business may have done under another regulator somewhere else
🎰 What a licence with sisters on it looks like
ProgressPlay Limited holds a licence whose domain names section runs to 191 addresses, split at 20 marked Active, 104 marked White Label and 67 marked Inactive, all counted on 15 August 2026. An address goes in the White Label column when the business selling under that name is not the business the licence belongs to.
That same file shows the counting problem in action. The heading above the addresses says 192; the tables beneath it list 191. Both figures came off one page in one second and neither is flagged as the wrong one, so both are printed here whenever they disagree.
Set beside that, the 10Bet file is about as plain as a British betting licence gets: one company, one name, two addresses and no partner brands riding on it.
❌ Why other guides hand 10Bet a list anyway
Checking it takes about a minute. Type 10bet into the business search the Commission publishes and count the licences that come back: one does. Longer lists are generally assembled out of overseas markets and out of names that merely look similar, and neither of those shares the licence covering a bet struck in Britain.
The other common route to a longer list is the software. Plenty of British books share a platform without sharing an owner, and a list built that way describes what a site feels like to use rather than who is holding your balance. Those are two different questions, and only one of them decides where a complaint ends up.
What any bookmaker is giving away this week changes faster than anything else on a gambling site, and none of it is quoted here. Everything above comes off a public file that will still say the same thing next weekend.
🔗 More on the licences behind British bookmakers
MarathonBet is the other single brand bookmaker written up here, and its position is the exact reverse of the one described above. ProgressPlay is the 191 address file used for contrast. Sportingbet sits inside the Entain group, which is the multi brand arrangement 10Bet has never had.
See 10Bet on the sportsbook sister sites index.