The Malta company file, in full – checked August 2026
The sixteen British casinos in the Casino Rewards family – Luxury Casino, Zodiac Casino, Yukon Gold, Grand Hotel Casino, Captain Cooks, UK Casino Club, Villento, Aztec Riches, Golden Tiger, Casino Action, Grand Mondial, Colosseum Casino, Blackjack Ballroom, Quatro Casino, Casino Classic and Virtual City Casino – all sit on one licensed company, Apollo Entertainment Limited of Malta, company C-45483, holding UKGC account 38620. The register carries 27 domain names and 29 trading names on that account, and on 10 August 2026 all 27 domains read Active with nothing filed as Inactive and nothing filed as White Label. Walking all 27 on the same day found three trading as shops in their own right – Luxury, Zodiac and UK Casino Club – ten forwarding the visitor into Luxury Casino, and fourteen returning no page at all.
Company record
| Detail | What account 38620 files |
|---|---|
| Licensed company | Apollo Entertainment Limited, a Maltese company under registration C-45483 |
| UKGC account | 38620, held since 2014 and current at the time of writing |
| Head office on file | A Sir Temi Zammit Avenue address in Malta |
| British permission | Casino, Remote – how the register says online – licence 038620-R-319310-012, Active from 1 November 2014 with no closing date |
| Trading-name column | 29 rows, every row Active, every name ending in the letters uk |
| Domain column | 27 rows against a counter of 27, every row Active, every address a .co.uk |
| Premises column | Empty. Nothing land based has ever been attached to this account |
| Regulatory actions counter | Reads 0, and the actions page behind it carries no entry |
| Shape of the business | One company running names it owns. No partner brand appears anywhere on the file |
Every address on account 38620, and what the status column says
A domain count tells you how large a licence is. The status column tells you what kind of business is behind it, and on this account the two figures line up in a way they rarely do. The counter at the top of the page says 27. The table underneath returns 27 rows. Every one of those rows reads Active. There is no Inactive row, no White Label row, and a stem check across the whole table turns up no pair of addresses sharing a name, so nothing here is a migration from an older spelling either.
Then there is what those Active rows actually do. All 27 were opened in turn on 10 August 2026, and they fall into three groups. Three trade as shops of their own: luxurycasino.co.uk, zodiac-casino.co.uk and ukcasino-club.co.uk. Ten forward the visitor into Luxury Casino: blackjackballroom.co.uk, captaincookcasino.co.uk, casino-action.co.uk, casinoclassic.co.uk, grandhotelcasino.co.uk, grandmondial.co.uk, gtcasino.co.uk, quatrocasino.co.uk, villento.co.uk and yukongoldcasino.co.uk. Fourteen returned no page at all: aztecriches.co.uk, casino-kingdom.co.uk, casinoshare.co.uk, challengecasino.co.uk, colosseum-casino.co.uk, goldenreefcasino.co.uk, luckyemperorcasino.co.uk, musichallcasino.co.uk, nostalgiacasino.co.uk, phoeniciancasino.co.uk, richreels.co.uk, vegascountrycasino.co.uk, vegasslotcasino.co.uk and virtualcitycasino.co.uk.
That split is the single most useful thing on this file, and it is worth being blunt about what it means. An Active marker records that an address is filed and live on the licence. It does not promise a website at the other end. Twenty-four of these 27 rows have no shop of their own behind them – ten hand the visitor to a different brand, fourteen answer with nothing – and a reader who counted the register rows and assumed 27 casinos would be wrong by a factor of nine. The register is describing permissions, not premises, and on this account the gap between the two is the whole story.
Twenty-nine names, twenty-seven addresses
The trading-name column runs two rows longer than the domain column, and the gap is exact rather than approximate. All 29 names read Active, and every one of them ends in the letters uk: aztec riches casino uk, blackjack ballroom uk, captain cook casino uk, casino action uk, casino classic uk, casino kingdom uk, casino share uk, challenge casino uk, colosseum casino uk, golden reef casino uk, golden tiger casino uk, grand hotel casino uk, grand mondial uk, lucky emperor casino uk, luxury casino uk, music hall casino uk, nostalgia casino uk, phoenician casino uk, players palace casino uk, quatro casino uk, rich reels casino uk, strike it lucky casino uk, ukcasino club uk, vegas country casino uk, vegas slot casino uk, villento casino uk, virtual city casino uk, yukon gold casino uk and zodiac casino uk.
Two of those names have no domain filed against them anywhere on the account: strike it lucky casino uk and players palace casino uk. That is the whole of the difference between 29 and 27, which makes the gap explainable rather than mysterious – the licence permits the names to be used, and no British address has been registered under either of them. One further quirk is worth knowing if you search the register yourself: the Captain Cooks brand is filed in the singular, as captain cook casino uk, so a search on the plural spelling can come back looking emptier than it is.
One permission, one licence number, one start date
Most of the groups covered on this site carry a stack of permissions with different start dates – a casino licence from one year, bingo added later, real-event betting added later still. Account 38620 carries a single line. Casino, Remote, licence number 038620-R-319310-012, Active from 1 November 2014, with the To column reading Current. That is the entire permission structure, and it is the simplest of any operator in this register.
Two practical consequences come out of that single line. A casino permission does not stretch to sport, so nothing filed here may lawfully accept a wager on a football match or a horse race, and a Casino Rewards page offering British players a sportsbook would be running it under a different licence entirely. And with the premises column empty, there is no betting shop, arcade or land-based casino anywhere in the group – the licence is remote from beginning to end. Where a company holds four or five permissions, the register is describing a business that has grown sideways into new products. Here it is describing a business that has done one thing since 2014 and added nothing to it.
Owner-operator, not a platform host
Put this account beside the two large host files already documented here and the difference is immediate. Jumpman Gaming files 131 addresses as White Label, 80 as Inactive and 18 as Active. White Hat Gaming files 25 as White Label, 8 as Inactive and 7 as Active own-brand. Apollo Entertainment files 27 rows and every one of them is Active own-brand, with nothing in either of the other two columns.
The White Label marker records that the shopfront belongs to a partner company while the licensed party answering to the Commission is the account holder. It is not a quality judgement, and it changes nothing about the conditions a site works under – but it does mean the public name and the name on the licence belong to different companies. On 38620 they are the same company at every address. That has one clear reader benefit: whichever of these sixteen brands you open, the business responsible for the money, the complaint and the exclusion is Apollo Entertainment Limited, and you do not have to work out which partner runs which shopfront.
It also explains the sameness that players notice. A host group looks different from site to site because different partners design the sites. An owner-operator group looks the same everywhere because one company built every one of them, and the three storefronts still trading make that obvious within a few seconds.
What the three open storefronts show
All three were read live on 10 August 2026. Each one resolves to an /en-gb address, and each one is built from the same template. The navigation carries the same five items in the same order on all three – Home, Casino Games, Winners List, Contact Us and a Play Here button. The foot of each page carries the same eight links: About Us, Privacy Policy, Verification Policy, Responsible Gambling, Fair Play, Source of Funds, Terms and Conditions and Casino Affiliate Program.
The licensee sentence at the bottom is identical on all three, with only the brand name swapped in and an affiliate tag appended – TYPEIN_LXC-EU on Luxury, TYPEIN_ZC-EU on Zodiac, TYPEIN_UKC-EU on UK Casino Club. Each names Apollo Entertainment Limited as a Maltese registered company, gives the same Malta company number C-45483, gives the same Sir Temi Zammit Avenue registered address and then states that the Commission regulates the company for British customers, under a number printed as 38620. Worth knowing when you compare the page against the register: 38620 is the account number, and the licence number on the Commission file is 038620-R-319310-012. The two are not interchangeable, and the shorter one is what these footers show.
Where the three differ is in what the homepage puts in front of you. Luxury Casino leads on a promise of over 1000 games, a payout rate given as 97%, a loyalty programme and round-the-clock support, under a line about a quarter-century of trading. Zodiac Casino carries a games carousel, a progressive slots row and a running total labelled Total jackpots available, which read £13,236,718.13 when the page was loaded on 10 August 2026, alongside a recent-winners strip dated the same day. Two details on that strip are worth reading carefully: the amounts are shown in Canadian dollars and euros rather than pounds, so it is a group-wide board rather than a British one, and neither Luxury nor UK Casino Club prints that total on a front page, although the games page at each carries the same board to within a few pence. UK Casino Club leads on the size of the games library instead, and its page carries third-party trademark notices for licensed slot titles together with a copyright line naming a company other than the licensee. The register connects none of those names to account 38620, and neither do we.
Neither Luxury nor Zodiac puts a welcome offer in figures on the front page, and UK Casino Club leads on the size of the games library rather than on a number. Anyone comparing these brands on the strength of a bonus headline has to open the promotions page to find one, and the three sites are close enough in construction that the offer may be the only thing separating them.
The name that answers to two licensees
Search the business register for rich reels and two results come back, which is one more than any other name in this family produces. The first is Apollo Entertainment Limited on 38620, trading as rich reels casino uk, with richreels.co.uk attached. The second is a separate company called Rich Reels Limited, holding account 55819 from an address at Phoenix Business Centre on Higham Road in Chesham, Buckinghamshire.
The second account is not an online casino and never was. It filed two non-remote permissions on licence 055819-N-332271-001 – Gaming Machine General Adult Gaming Centre and Gaming Machine Technical Supplier – and both were Surrendered, running from 11 February 2020 to 7 February 2024. Nothing else is filed under it – not one domain, not one trading name, no premises, and no entry on the actions page. In other words, a machine business in England that gave up its licences in 2024 shares a name with a Maltese online brand, and nothing on either file connects them.
That is worth knowing for two reasons. Reading the register by brand name rather than by account number is how mix-ups of this kind get published, and a surrendered licence on a similarly named company is exactly the sort of thing that gets attached to the wrong operator. The other names in this family behave: searches on zodiac, luxury casino, captain cook and yukon gold each return account 38620 and nothing else.
Sanctions on file – six searches and six nil returns
The actions page attached to 38620 records nothing against the business, and the counter above it reads 0. Six searches were run on the regulatory-actions register on 10 August 2026 – on the licensee name apollo, on the family name casino rewards, and on the brands zodiac, luxury casino, grand mondial and rich reels. Each returned nothing. A sweep of Commission news and enforcement pages for the licensee and for the family name returned only register pages and the register download file – no announcement, no public statement, no penalty.
Here is what that does and does not license anyone to say. It licenses this: no action against this account appears on either register, and none was found in the Commission news archive on the date of the check. It does not license a claim about the whole history of the business, and this register has learned that lesson expensively. A counter of zero has been proved wrong fourteen times in this programme, most recently on an operator whose account showed nothing on both registers while two announcements totalling £910,000 stayed published on the Commission website, one of them closing by directing the reader to a sanctions register that returns nothing for it. A closed case drops off a live account. A brand search misses an action filed under a licensee name. A public statement is taken down three years after the date it was issued, while a news article stays up.
So the accurate summary of Apollo Entertainment on the enforcement question is a negative that has been tested six ways and has held on each of them, published with the date it was taken. If an action against this licensee is announced tomorrow, none of the sentences above becomes untrue – they describe searches, not the character of a company.
One licensee behind every address
Because all 27 addresses sit on one remote licence held by one company, everything a player can escalate goes to the same place. A complaint about a game result, a withdrawal, a bonus term or an account closure at Zodiac is answered by the same licensed business as the identical complaint raised at Luxury or at UK Casino Club, and the licence conditions that apply are the same set at every site. There is no partner company in between, which on a host account is the party a player often ends up dealing with first.
Self-exclusion works on two levels and it is worth keeping them apart. An exclusion set inside one of these brands is administered by Apollo Entertainment Limited, the licensed party, so it reaches the account it was set on. A registration with GAMSTOP goes considerably wider – it applies across every operator licensed for remote gambling in Great Britain, so it covers this family and every other one on this site at the same time. For a family built out of near-identical shopfronts, that distinction matters more than usual: sixteen brands that look alike can otherwise feel like sixteen separate decisions.
Not a single inactive row
Companies that host other brands leave a trail of departures. Eighty addresses have gone dark on the Jumpman file and eight on White Hat, three of which turn out to be the same brand moving from a .com to a .co.uk rather than a brand leaving. Account 38620 has none. No row on the domain table reads Inactive, and the stem check finds no address filed twice under different endings, so nothing has quietly migrated either.
What the file does hold instead is slack in the other direction: two trading names, Players Palace and Strike It Lucky, permitted but with no British address behind them. Those are the only two entries on the whole account that describe something not currently trading, and even they are permissions rather than remains. A reader looking for the story of what this operator used to run will not find it on the Commission register, because the register records what is filed now and this licensee has filed the same shape of business since 2014.
Check it on the register yourself
Every number above comes from five pages that anyone can open, and they are worth a look before trusting any casino site on the subject, including this one:
- Licence summary for account 38620 – the counters and the single casino permission
- Domain names on 38620 – the 27 rows and the status column
- Trading names on 38620 – the 29 rows, including the two with no address
- Regulatory sanctions on 38620 – the page that carries no entry
- The regulatory-actions register searched on apollo – one of the six nil returns
Change log
| Date checked | What the file showed |
|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026 | Register re-read in full: counters of 29 trading names, 27 domains, 0 premises and 0 regulatory actions; the domain table returns 27 rows and every row reads Active, with no Inactive row, no White Label row and no repeated stem |
| 10 Aug 2026 | Six searches run on the regulatory-actions register – apollo, casino rewards, zodiac, luxury casino, grand mondial, rich reels – each returning nothing; Commission news sweep returned register pages only |
| 10 Aug 2026 | All 27 addresses opened in turn: three trading on the same template (Luxury, Zodiac, UK Casino Club), ten forwarding into Luxury Casino, and fourteen returning no page at all |
| 10 Aug 2026 | A running jackpot total is printed on the Zodiac front page, at £13,236,718.13, with winner amounts shown in Canadian dollars and euros; the same board sits on the games page at the other two |
| 10 Aug 2026 | Business register: rich reels returns two accounts – 38620 and Rich Reels Limited 55819, a Buckinghamshire gaming machine licensee with both non-remote permissions surrendered on 7 February 2024 |
| 6 Aug 2026 | yukongoldcasino.co.uk redirect to luxurycasino.co.uk confirmed; the offshore address at yukongold.casino carries no British filing on the register |
Apollo entries in this register
Sixteen brand pages carry the register treatment for this account. The redirect case sits at Yukon Gold Casino and its destination at Luxury Casino. The other trading storefronts are Zodiac Casino and UK Casino Club. The rest of the family reads across as Villento Casino, Grand Hotel Casino, Casino Action, Captain Cooks Casino, Aztec Riches Casino, Quatro Casino, Colosseum Casino, Grand Mondial Casino, Golden Tiger Casino, Casino Classic, Virtual City Casino and Blackjack Ballroom.