Jumpman Gaming Casinos & Bingo Sites

Company record

Field	Entry
Licensee	Jumpman Gaming Limited
UKGC account	39175
Head office	La Corvee House, La Corvee, Alderney, GY9 3TQ, United Kingdom
GB permissions	Remote bingo and remote casino – remote covers play over the internet – both running since 1 November 2014
Domain rows	229 counted in the table against a counter reporting 231 (checked August 2026)
Status split	18 Active, 131 White Label, 80 Inactive
Trading names	None at all – the page returns nothing
Premises	None
Sanctions	Counter at zero; £500,000 settlement announced 17 May 2022
Safer gambling	Network tooling at jumpmancares.co.uk; exclusion applies across every address on the account
Platform	One cashier and one game library sit behind all 229 addresses

What the status column actually says

Most descriptions of this licence present Jumpman as a maker of themed casinos: dozens of shopfronts, one engine underneath. The register tells a more precise story, and it sits in a column most readers never open.

Of the 229 rows filed against 39175, only 18 carry the status Active. Another 131 are marked White Label. The remaining 80 read Inactive. That ratio changes what this licence is. A business with eighteen live addresses of its own, and one hundred and thirty-one operated on behalf of other people, is not mainly a chain of casinos. It is a platform renting out a licence, a cashier and a game library to anyone who wants a brand of their own – the same arrangement White Hat Gaming runs on account 52894, though Jumpman files roughly five times as many addresses.

The distinction matters to a player for one blunt reason. Where a brand sits in that column tells you whose business you are dealing with when something goes wrong. It does not change how far a decision travels: every row here, whatever its status, runs on one account and one licence number, so a verification outcome or a self-exclusion reaches the whole network either way. What changes is who answers the email.

It also explains why so many of these sites feel identical. They are identical. The differences a player can actually act on are the promotional mechanic, the bonus terms and whichever partner is handling support, and none of those is on the register at all.

The eighteen addresses this licence runs itself

These are the rows the Commission marks Active on 39175, in the order the register prints them: amazonslots.com, bigthunderslots.com, buffalospins.com, crystalslots.com, dovebingo.com, doveslots.com, incrediblespins.co.uk, lightscamerabingo.com, lootcasino.com, pirateslots.com, rainbowspins.com, simbaslots.com, slotsroyale.co.uk, spacewins.com, targetslots.com, www.aladdinslots.com, www.slotskingdom.co.uk and zeusbingo.com.

Two of those eighteen appear elsewhere in this register under their own entries. Space Wins and Rainbow Spins are the only brands covered here that the Commission files as Active on this account. Every other Jumpman name we write about sits in the White Label column or has stopped trading.

The register is also inconsistent about how it writes these down, and the inconsistency is worth knowing about. Two of the eighteen carry a www. prefix where the other sixteen do not; across all 229 rows, twenty-six are filed that way. One row is recorded complete with protocol and trailing slash, as https://www.heyspin.com/, and it is the only entry on the account written as a full web address rather than a bare domain. None of that alters what is licensed. It does mean a register search for one spelling can miss a filing that is genuinely there, which is worth remembering before anyone concludes a site is unlicensed.

The brands in this register, and the column 39175 files them in

Brand	Address exactly as filed	Column
Space Wins	spacewins.com	Active
Rainbow Spins	rainbowspins.com	Active
BGT Games	bgtgames.com	White Label
Great Britain Casino	greatbritaincasino.com	White Label
HeySpin	https://www.heyspin.com/	White Label
Star Wins	starwins.co.uk	White Label
Wild West Wins	wildwestwins.com	White Label
Immortal Wins	immortalwins.com	Inactive

One entry in that table does something none of the others do. Searching the business register for heyspin.com returns two licensees, not one: AG Communications Limited on account 39483, filing the bare domain, and Jumpman Gaming Limited on 39175, filing the full web address. Both filings were live when this page was checked in August 2026. That is the operator move showing up as a register artefact – the departing account has not yet dropped the entry, and the arriving account has already added it. Anyone reading only the first result would attribute HeySpin to the wrong company.

What White Label means here, and what it does not

A White Label row means the Commission has been told that this address trades under a licence held by somebody other than the brand owner. The partner supplies the name, the marketing and usually the customer service. Jumpman supplies the licence, the payment rails, the games and the regulatory responsibility. If a White Label site fails a British player, the licensed party answerable to the Commission is Jumpman Gaming Limited, whatever the footer says in larger type.

Three things follow that are easy to get wrong. A White Label brand is not a smaller or less regulated site; it sits under exactly the same conditions as the eighteen Active ones. It is also not evidence that the brand owner is disreputable, since the arrangement is ordinary and openly filed. But it does mean the brand can move. A partner can take its name to a different platform, as HeySpin has just done in the opposite direction, and the register will show that migration long before the site does.

The practical test is simple. If two sites share an account number, they share an operator, a complaints route and an exclusion list, and no amount of separate branding changes that.

Two permissions, one number, one date

Account 39175 carries exactly two activities and both were switched on the same day. Remote bingo and remote casino each run under licence number 039175-R-319452-024, each marked Active from 1 November 2014, each with no end date recorded. There is no gambling software permission, no betting permission of any description and no lottery permission.

Two things follow. Nothing on this account may lawfully take a sports bet, however many of the 229 addresses carry a name that sounds like a bookmaker. And a single licence number governs the entire operation, so there is no second permission to fall back on: any regulatory decision reaching 039175-R-319452-024 would reach all 229 addresses at once. Compare that with an operator holding separate numbers per activity, where a restriction can be applied to one product and leave the rest running.

The trading-names page is a blank. Where most large licensees file a list of names they trade under, Jumpman files none and lets the domains carry the load. That produces a small register quirk: searching the business register for jumpman returns the company and reports no matching domain names, because not one of the 229 addresses contains the word. Searching for any individual brand returns the account through a domain row instead. The company and its brands are findable by two different routes, and neither route finds the other.

Sanctions on file – half a million pounds the account page never mentions

Read account 39175 on its own and you would conclude that nothing has ever happened here. The regulatory-actions counter sits at zero, the sanctions page for the account reports no recorded action, and typing Jumpman into the regulatory-actions register produces no match whatever. Three separate checks, all made in August 2026, all blank.

All three are silent about the past. A Commission announcement dated 17 May 2022 put Jumpman Gaming Limited down for £500,000, a sum directed not at the regulator but at the National Strategy to Reduce Gambling Harms. The licensee had 243 websites on the account at that point, and the investigation behind the figure identified failings in both anti-money laundering controls and customer protection. Progress Play Limited was named in the same announcement and paid £175,718 across 201 websites, taking the pair to £675,000. Leanne Oxley, then Director of Enforcement and Intelligence at the Commission, said operators who fail those obligations would always be clamped down on.

Note the shape of that settlement, because it is easy to misread as a fine. The money was not paid to the Commission and was not described as a financial penalty. A regulatory settlement is agreed rather than imposed, and it is directed at harm-reduction work. That is why nothing about it survives on the account page: the register records current sanctions against a currently licensed business, and an agreed settlement concluded four years ago is neither.

What Jumpman was actually found to have done was published separately, and that document has since been withdrawn. The withdrawal is itself on the record. In January 2026 a member of the public asked the Commission under the Freedom of Information Act for a copy of the action; the request was refused under section 21 of that Act, on the ground that the material was reasonably accessible elsewhere, and the reply pointed the requester towards web archives and towards a link for the withdrawn statement. That refusal notice is still published. The statement it points to is not. A reader in 2026 can therefore establish that a document existed, and read an official confirmation of its subject, without being able to read the document.

The surviving announcement is equally worth reading for what it omits. It records no formal warning, no additional licence condition, no divestment and no costs order against Jumpman. Those absences are part of the outcome and belong in any fair summary of it. A zero on this account establishes only that nothing stands against it today.

Verified roster entries

The register says where a brand is filed. It does not say whether the site opens. These are the live reads behind the entries above.

Brand	Domain	Condition at the last read
Wild West Wins	wildwestwins.com	Trading – footer verified 6 August 2026
Space Wins	spacewins.com	Trading – footer verified 6 August 2026
BGT Games	bgtgames.com	Trading – footer verified 6 August 2026
Star Wins	starwins.co.uk	Trading; the .com equivalent has lapsed to a page offering the domain for sale (6 August 2026)
HeySpin	heyspin.com	Trading – arrived from AG Communications during the 2026 Aspire wind-down, and still filed on both accounts
Immortal Wins	immortalwins.com	Shut – the address serves a closure notice sending balance queries to support and naming Rainbow Spins as the replacement (7 August 2026)
Great Britain Casino	greatbritaincasino.com	Trading – footer names Jumpman Gaming Limited and account 39175 (7 August 2026)
Rainbow Spins	rainbowspins.com	Trading – the destination named in the Immortal Wins notice, on the same account footer

Every footer read across this network in August 2026 carried the same pairing: the Gambling Commission account for British players, the Alderney Gambling Control Commission for everyone else, and one registered address at La Corvee House.

Where a complaint reaches on 39175

Because one account and one licence number sit behind all 229 addresses, the routes out of a dispute are shared. A self-exclusion registered at any address on this account applies across the network rather than at the single site where it was set. The same is true of a closed or restricted account: the decision follows the customer, not the brand.

Safer-gambling tooling for the network is published at jumpmancares.co.uk, which serves every address on the licence. GAMSTOP covers the whole network as it covers any British-licensed remote operator, which is the mechanism to use if the intention is to stop gambling across all operators rather than this one. Where a complaint cannot be settled with the site directly, it goes to the alternative dispute resolution provider named in the terms of that site, and only then to the Commission – which regulates the licensee but does not arbitrate individual disputes.

The eighty that stopped

Eighty rows on this account read Inactive, which is more than four times the number still filed as Active. Names among them include atlantiswins.com, dreambingo.com, onlinebingo.com, eaglespins.com, immortalwins.com and dealornodeal.co.uk – a reminder that a licensed address can carry a very well-known title and still be out of service.

One check is worth running on any large account, and it produces an unusual answer here. On some licences a domain marked Inactive is not a closure at all but an address change, with a live twin filed under a different ending: on White Hat Gaming account 52894 that pattern accounts for three of the eight Inactive rows. Comparing all 229 rows on 39175 by their stem, ignoring the suffix and any www prefix, produces no such pair anywhere on the account. Not one Inactive address here has a live counterpart under another ending. On this licence, Inactive means gone.

Immortal Wins is the clearest current example, and it is the useful one because the migration was documented rather than silent. The register marks the domain Inactive; the site itself serves a closure notice; and that notice names Rainbow Spins, which the register marks Active. Register, site and successor all agree, which is rarer than it should be.

Check this yourself

Every figure above comes from pages anyone can open:

• Licence summary for account 39175 – permissions, dates and the four counters
• Domain names on 39175 – the full table, with the status column that carries the argument on this page
• Trading names on 39175 – empty, and worth seeing empty
• Regulatory sanctions on 39175 – the page that reports nothing recorded
• The announcement of 17 May 2022 – the settlement the account page does not carry
• The Freedom of Information response of 23 January 2026 – the refusal that outlived the statement

Change log

Date	Entry
10 Aug 2026	Domain table counted row by row: 229 rows against a counter reporting 231, splitting 18 Active, 131 White Label and 80 Inactive. The finding that only eighteen addresses are operated under the licensee own name is new to this page and rewrites its description of the business
10 Aug 2026	heyspin.com found filed on two accounts at once – AG Communications 39483 as a bare domain, Jumpman 39175 as https://www.heyspin.com/
10 Aug 2026	Stem comparison across all 229 rows returned no Inactive address with a live twin, so the eighty Inactive rows are departures rather than address changes
10 Aug 2026	The claim that nothing had ever been recorded against this account was withdrawn as false – the Commission announced a £500,000 settlement on 17 May 2022, and the Freedom of Information refusal of 23 January 2026 confirms the withdrawn public statement existed
7 Aug 2026	Immortal Wins found closed – immortalwins.com serves a closure notice routing balance queries to support and naming Rainbow Spins as the replacement brand
7 Aug 2026	Rainbow Spins and Great Britain Casino footers read live: Jumpman Gaming Limited, account 39175, Alderney licence for players outside Great Britain
6 Aug 2026	HeySpin verified under Jumpman (39175) after leaving the Aspire Global network
6 Aug 2026	starwins.co.uk confirmed as the surviving address; the .com equivalent now offers itself for sale

Jumpman entries in this register

For the operator-change story start at HeySpin, the one brand here filed on two accounts at once. Great Britain Casino and Immortal Wins carry the fullest treatment, the second now as a closure. Then Space Wins and Wild West Wins, with Star Wins and BGT Games for the two shortest files. Each carries its own dated footer check.