Offers subject to operator terms. This page contains affiliate links.
🏠 One account, four brands, no closures
🎉 The newest of the four
🎯 Three sisters, one shared machine
All three run on the same platform and the same rulebook as Los Vegas, and each one wraps it around something genuinely different rather than just a different coat of paint.
What none of the three changes is the company, the licence or the rules behind them. Those are set once and apply to all four names alike, from the protection level on a balance to the age checks at signup.
📜 The account behind four names
SuprPlay Limited holds the Gambling Commission licence all four brands trade under, head office in Malta, covering remote casino only since 2017, with no end date and no permission for betting, bingo or lottery. Every one of the four sites prints its own licence reference in its terms, and it does not quite match the one the regulator shows for the same account: only the closing digits differ, which is consistent with a reference changing each time a filing is updated rather than anything more troubling. Report both versions and take neither as the error; the company, the account and the underlying permission all genuinely match.
No trading name has ever been filed for any of the four brands. They exist on the public file purely as web addresses, which means searching by brand name rather than by address returns nothing.
📋 The Los Vegas licence file, in short
- Licence holder: SuprPlay Limited, Malta head office, remote casino only since 2017
- Four addresses filed, all marked Active, none ever Inactive since the licence began
- No trading names filed for any of the four brands
- A Los Vegas balance sits at the lowest of three protection levels the regulator asks operators to declare, the same as every sister
🔁 From Malta to a Nasdaq listing
SuprPlay Limited sits inside a wider group called SuprNation, which the Los Vegas footer itself dates back to 2015. SuprNation was bought outright by DoubleDown Interactive, a Nasdaq listed company whose main business is casino games that use pretend money instead of real stakes, in a deal agreed in January 2023 and completed that October for around $36.5 million. DoubleDown described the business it bought as holding four separate national permissions in total, only one of them the British one behind Los Vegas. The brands actually named in that sale were VoodooDreams, NY Spins and Duelz; Los Vegas was not among them, the clearest evidence that Los Vegas launched after the sale rather than before it.
🌟 The plainest of the four, and the newest
Los Vegas trades at the only dot bet address in the family; the other three all sit on dot com. Its tagline plays on the misspelling: Wrong Spelling. Right Attitude. It is also the plainest to use: no player levels, no tournaments, no marketplace and no language switcher, a positive finding from a direct read rather than an assumption, since Los Vegas simply stacks games, promotions and help on top of the same platform and nothing more. Anyone wanting a lobby with nothing extra in the way finds it here rather than on VoodooDreams or Duelz.
🔍 A clean record, with a gap worth knowing
Nothing is recorded against the account on its own actions page, and a search of a separate enforcement listing the regulator keeps, under every name connected to this family, including the account number itself, returned nothing either. That listing, the one worth qualifying the zero against, holds only entries from September 2023 onward. SuprPlay has held its licence since 2017, so that search reaches back only three years into a licence now nine years old; the six years before that simply are not in the source everybody, including this page, checked.
❓ Do not confuse it with the other Vegases
The name causes more trouble than anything else about this brand. Los Vegas shares no company and no licence with Leo Vegas, Lucky Vegas, Vegas Winner, Magical Vegas, Dream Vegas or Sky Vegas, six entirely separate companies on six entirely separate licences. Borrowing a word from a Nevada city creates no relationship between any of them, and plenty of sister-site lists have been built on the assumption that it does. The test that actually settles it is the account behind the licence: two sites sharing one account are related, two sites sharing a name are not, unless the record says otherwise.
- ✅ Safe: checking the account behind a name rather than the name itself, since Los Vegas shares no company with any other Vegas branded casino on this page.
- ❌ Costly: searching the regulator trading names column for Los Vegas. That column is empty for this operator; the brand exists on the file only as a web address.
🔗 Where the rest of the file sits
Everything above traces back to one company, one account and four names, and the deeper file, including the full ownership chain and the licence reference mismatch, sits in one place rather than repeated four times over.
The account behind all four brands, the ownership chain and the licence reference mismatch in full
See Los Vegas on the casino sister sites index.