Offers subject to operator terms. This page contains affiliate links.
⏰ Permissions running since October 2018
✅ Casino only, no sport on the menu
🏆 Six picks off the Barz licence, each doing a different job
Six of those thirty one are set out below. Each was opened and read in August 2026, and each is described by what it puts on screen. All six are partner brands like Barz, part of the twenty five that White Hat runs for other businesses, and the December 2020 settlement covered further down names three brands from this group. Casimba, Dream Vegas and Grand Ivy all carry a sportsbook beside the casino. Miami Dice, the Temple Nile page and the Spin Station write-up cover three more.
💻 What the Barz site itself shows
Barz answered normally when it was opened on 14 August 2026. Slots lead the lobby, and the menu also carries a live casino section, a promotions page, a loyalty scheme and a VIP area. It carries no sports section.
The licence file matches that. Two of the five permissions on the file cover sport, real events under one and virtual ones under the other, and most of the names sitting on this licence never touch them. Three that do are Casimba, Grand Ivy and Dream Vegas. Barz and Spinland Sister Sites do not.
📋 Read on the Barz site, 14 August 2026
- Slots lead the lobby, with a live casino section beside them
- A promotions page, a loyalty scheme and a VIP area on the same menu
- No sports section anywhere on the site, and no betting markets
- A failed login is answered with a support address at dreamvegas.com
Barz does not answer its own post when a login goes wrong. The address it hands out belongs to another brand on the same licence. The two sites share a help desk, not just a licence holder.
📜 The licence file behind Barz
Anyone selling gambling into Britain needs a licence first, and the office that signs one off is the Gambling Commission. No such licence exists in the Barz name. The one Barz trades under was granted to White Hat Gaming Limited, a company filed at the Cornerstone Business Centre, Mosta, in Malta, and every web address on it is run by that same company.
Five permissions sit on it, and every one of them began on 29 October 2018 and has run unbroken since. Two of them are betting permissions, one covering real events and the other virtual ones. Casino, bingo and gambling software make up the other three. All are written for gambling supplied over the internet, and no premises appear on the file at all.
Forty web addresses are attached to it. Twenty five of them carry the White Label marking, eight are shown as no longer trading, and the remaining seven are house names. Barz belongs to the twenty five. All forty are set out on the White Hat Gaming licence page.
📄 Four things the file says about Barz
- White Label means a partner business runs the brand under its own name while the duties that come with a British licence stay with White Hat
- One trading name is filed across the whole thing, white hat gaming, so no single brand on it can be looked up as a business of its own
- Players outside Britain are covered instead by a Maltese licence, and its date is 1 August 2018
- A few brands here return a second file too, closed now and holding the .com spellings, which is the mark of a licence changing hands and not of a site shutting
📑 The settlement dated December 2020
White Hat Gaming Limited reached terms with the regulator on 28 December 2020. Rather than being collected as a fine, £1.3 million was put towards work on gambling harm. The assessment behind it found weakness in the way the business picked out players at raised risk and then looked after them, both of money laundering and of harm from their own gambling.
Four web addresses were written into it. Two of them were 21casino.com and dreamvegas.com. The other two were hellocasino.com and grandivy.com. Barz was not one of the four and is not named anywhere in it.
Three customer cases were published alongside the settlement. The first went through £85,000 in not much more than an hour. The second reached £50,000 in six hours. In the third, where £70,000 went over three months, nobody ever established where the money had come from.
📝 What the company undertook to change
- Firmer checking of where player money comes from
- More safer gambling contact with customers
- Spending cut off automatically once a player limit is reached
- Money laundering controls reviewed on a set cycle
Those four undertakings reach Barz because the checks a player meets here are not built by Barz. The identity questions, the source of funds requests and the deposit limits are the ones White Hat runs across every address on the file.
🌐 The other names on the same file
Barz shares the file with thirty one other live casino names, and those names fall into two groups. Twenty five of the forty addresses are run for partner businesses, and Barz is one of them. Seven more are house names, traded by White Hat itself.
🏷 Partner brands beside Barz
- With pages here: Karamba, Slot Planet, Spin Rider, Jackpot Village, PlayGrand and Griffon Casino
- Without one yet: Playzee, Hopa, Casilando, Blackjack City, Casiku, Mr Run, Mr Ben, 247Bet, SpinYoo, Bettarget and 21 Casino
- Eight further addresses on the file have stopped trading, which is how the total reaches forty
None of those partner names is licensed in its own right. The name over the door belongs to the partner business, and it picks the brand and does the marketing. The identity checks, the payments, the complaint route and the money behind all of it belong to White Hat.
Two casinos on this file can be built to look alike or built to look nothing alike. The duties that come with a British licence are the same on both, because they belong to the licence holder rather than to the brand.
🔖 The names White Hat sells without a partner
White Hat markets those seven house names itself, with no partner business in between. Four have pages here: Slotnite, the Hello Casino page, the Diamond 7 write-up and Skol Casino. The other three, Mainstage Bingo, 21 Prive and G day Casino, do not.
A house name and a partner name on this file differ in who picked the brand and who markets it. The identity checks, the payment handling and the complaint route are run by the same company on both.
- ✅ Safe: Every address on this file answers to the same company, so a dispute at Barz follows the same route as a dispute at any of the other thirty one.
- ❌ Costly: Treating two names on this file as two separate businesses, and opening a second account expecting a different set of checks.
See Barz Casino on the casino sister sites index.