Offers subject to operator terms. This page contains affiliate links.
🔒 76 of 76 listed addresses Inactive
🔑 Five names still open elsewhere
📈 Five names from the Slotzo account, still open today
None of these five brands are being recommended here as somewhere new to sign up; they are the honest answer to where five names from the same account actually went. Two joined White Hat Gaming alongside Karamba and Griffon Casino, three joined a company based in Jersey, and one joined a separate British licensee entirely. Each is covered below with what a visitor actually finds there today, not with whatever offer happened to be on show on any single day.
🔍 What the Slotzo address serves now
Typing the old Slotzo address into a browser today does not reach a casino. It opens a page headed Best Slot Sites UK 2026, which ranks other operators, carries its own commission disclosure for readers who sign up through it, and holds no gambling licence of its own. The casinos it features are 666 Casino, Dream Jackpot, Mr Luck and Red Casino, four of the five names that left the closed account for Jupiter Gaming. The old brand name now points visitors toward its own former sisters rather than toward anything Slotzo itself ever ran.
Mr Mega has the same second life a few doors down. That address now opens a page headed Find Top Online Casinos, stated as run by an unrelated company, and it too ranks operators outside the closed account. Neither address is the casino it used to be, and neither is a relaunch of Slotzo or Mr Mega under new ownership.
🏢 The licence behind the closed addresses
The Gambling Commission is the body that decides who may sell gambling to British customers, and every decision it makes is published. Slotzo traded on one such entry, held by AG Communications Limited, based in St Julians, Malta. That entry lists three permissions: casino cover reaching back to 1 November 2014, real-event betting joined on 28 September 2017, and bingo added 27 August 2019, every one of them Remote and every one still marked Active.
What makes the entry unusual is that the permissions are live while nothing behind them is trading. The summary at the top states 78 web addresses; the table beneath it lists 76. Both figures are printed here because neither is obviously the error. Every one of the 76 addresses in the table reads Inactive, so there is no address left on the account that is actually taking a player. One trading name is filed against the whole account, aspireglobal, and no premises are recorded anywhere on it.
A group called NeoGames acquired the underlying business in 2022, and Aristocrat then folded NeoGames into its own operations, with that purchase finishing in 2024. Material published by the company describes the closures that followed as a commercial decision to leave the British consumer market, not as a licence being taken away.
📋 What the account entry shows, 14 August 2026
- Real-event betting added 28 September 2017; bingo followed on 27 August 2019
- Casino permission live since 1 November 2014
- 78 web addresses in the summary, 76 in the table beneath it
- Every one of the 76 listed addresses is marked Inactive
⚖ Two enforcement cases, one on the current counter
Two separate enforcement outcomes sit against this account, and the counter on the public entry currently shows only the more recent of the two. The older case, decided 14 November 2022, ran to a £237,600 financial penalty, alongside a formal warning and extra conditions placed on the licence, because the company could not show it had carried out proper checks on six third-party businesses trading under its licence.
The second and more recent case was a settlement decided 4 February 2025, with the public statement published 4 March 2025. AG Communications Limited agreed to pay £1,407,834 in lieu of a financial penalty, a figure that includes £220,334 of divested money, plus a contribution toward the cost of the investigation. The findings covered money laundering checks that leaned too heavily on how much a customer had spent rather than on wider risk, two account reviews that ran a week and eight days late, and a daily loss-limit system that failed for a group of older accounts, letting around 176 customers deposit beyond their own set limit, which is the source of the £220,334 figure. One self-exclusion failing is recorded within the same case, running from October 2022 to May 2024. The breaches themselves span May 2023 to October 2024. The current counter reflects only this second case; the 2022 penalty survives in the wider enforcement record rather than in that single figure.
📌 Both cases, side by side
- 14 November 2022: £237,600 penalty, a formal warning, additional licence conditions
- 4 February 2025: a £1,407,834 settlement, including £220,334 divested
- Breaches dated May 2023 to October 2024, plus one self-exclusion failing, October 2022 to May 2024
- Only the 2025 case appears on the current live counter
💰 Getting a balance back, and the self-exclusion question
A closed website does not cancel a balance owed to a customer. Contact should go to the email address the account was opened with, giving the account name and the amount believed owed, and an identity check should be expected before anything moves. Money sits under what is officially termed a medium protection rating, meaning customer funds are kept apart from company money day to day, not that a government scheme guarantees them.
If a written request goes nowhere, a licensed operator must offer a free independent complaints service, and the one named for this family of brands is eCOGRA, reachable once a final answer has arrived or after eight weeks, whichever comes first. IBAS handles the same kind of dispute and can redirect a complaint if the right route is not obvious. The regulator itself does not rule on individual balances; it acts against the licence, and the named complaints service is what actually decides a claim.
On self-exclusion: an exclusion set directly with a brand does not automatically travel with that brand to a new licensee when it moves, which is worth knowing given how many names on this account changed hands. GAMSTOP works differently and covers every UK-licensed gambling site at once, casino, bingo or betting, regardless of which company holds the licence, so a GAMSTOP exclusion is unaffected by any of the moves or closures described on this page.
- ✅ Safe: treating 666 Casino, Mr Luck, King Casino, Red Casino and HeySpin as five genuinely separate, currently licensed businesses, not as five faces of the closed Slotzo account.
- ❌ Costly: mistaking the comparison page now sitting at the Slotzo address for a relaunch. It is an unconnected site with its own commission disclosure, run by people who never operated the original casino.
🔗 The rest of the Aspire Global file
The move to Jupiter Gaming is covered in full on the 666 Casino page, and the move to Jumpman Gaming sits on the HeySpin page. Karamba and Griffon Casino, the two names that went to White Hat Gaming, have their own pages too: Karamba and Griffon Casino. For the closures, Mr Mega carries the same repurposed-address story as this page, and QueenPlay, Regent Play and Plaza Royal each closed in the same wave, with a notice still live at the address.
The whole company file, both enforcement outcomes, and every closed or moved brand
See Slotzo Casino on the casino sister sites index.